引用本文: 徐伟,马丽,高楠.2017版和2009版国家医保药品目录的对比研究[J].中国卫生经济,2018,(1):44-47.[点击复制] .The Contrast about National Reimbursement Drug List between 2009 and 2017[J].CHINESE HEALTH ECONOMICS,2018,(1):44-47.[点击复制]
【打印本页】 查看/发表评论 关闭

←前一篇|后一篇→

过刊浏览    高级检索

本文已被:浏览 1984次   下载 71 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
2017版和2009版国家医保药品目录的对比研究
0
()
摘要:
目的:探索新版医保目录的调整方向,为指导各省制定省级增补目录提供依据。方法:运用EXCEL和SPSS18.0对2009版《药品目录》和2017版《药品目录》进行对比分析,比较二者差异。结果:新版目录中药品种数增加明显,医保新增谈判药品目录;新版目录西药的分类方式发生改变;目录增补品种多,剔除药品少;医保目录新增剂型多为颗粒剂、口服液体制剂;甲乙类药品增长比例基本一致;国家增强了药品适应症支付限制,减少了对医保门诊的报销限定。结论:本次医保目录调整重点扶持中药和民族药,关注高值药品和儿童药,药品分类更为细化,目录管理日趋严格。
关键词:  
DOI:
基金项目:
The Contrast about National Reimbursement Drug List between 2009 and 2017
()
Abstract:
Objective: To explore the adjustment direction of new National Reimbursement Drug List(NDRL) and provide guidance about supplement of Reimbursement Drug List for each province. Method: Comparing the difference about NDRL between 2009 and 2017 with instruments including EXCEL and SPSS18.0 . Results: More drugs and negotiated drugs are added into the new NDRL; The classification method of western drugs has been changed; The amount of supplementary drugs is more than eliminated drugs; The main dosage of supplementary drugs form is granules and Oral Liquid; The growth proportion of Class-A and Class-B is similar; The government has imposed restrictions on drug indication and canceled limit to r eimbursement of outpatient service. Conclusion: The new NDRL supports with the hand the T raditional Chinese medicine and pays more attention to expensive drugs and p ediatric drugs. It also subdivides the drug classification and make catalog management more strictly.
Key words:  

用微信扫一扫

用微信扫一扫