| 引用本文: |
杨硕,张淑杰,徐晶,等.基于德尔菲法构建黑龙江省医院临床医生绩效评价指标体系[J].中国卫生经济,2016,(11):69-72.[点击复制] |
.Based on Delphi to construct the Performance Evaluation Index System of Heilongjiang Province Hospital clinicians[J].CHINESE HEALTH ECONOMICS,2016,(11):69-72.[点击复制] |
|
| 摘要: |
| 摘要： 目的 基于德尔菲法，构建一套适用于黑龙江三甲医院临床医生绩效评价的指标体系，为临床医生的绩效考核提供科学依据。方法 通过文献研究，利用平衡计分法设计三甲医院临床医生绩效考核指标库；对21位专家进行两轮德尔菲专家咨询；利用SPSS 22.0统计软件并采用直接计算法确定分析两轮咨询问卷结果各项指标权重，筛选与省医院实际情况相关的临床医生个人绩效考核指标库。结果 两轮问卷有效回收率均为100%，专家积极系数为1；权威系数均值0.79，协调系数有显著性差异且P<0.001；最终构建的公立医院改革绩效评价指标体系包含4个一级指标，7个二级指标，28个三级指标，4个一级指标权重分别为0.343，0.188，0.224，0.245。结论 本次研究的专家积极性、权威度高，协调性较好，制订的考核指标具有较高的可靠性和可行性，适用于三甲医院临床医生绩效考核评价。 |
| 关键词: |
| DOI： |
|
| 基金项目: |
|
| Based on Delphi to construct the Performance Evaluation Index System of Heilongjiang Province Hospital clinicians |
|
| () |
| Abstract: |
| Abstract: Objective Based on Delphi, build a set of Performance Evaluation Index System of Heilongjiang Province Hospital clinicians to provide scientific basis of the clinician’s performance. Method Through the literature research and Balanced scorecard design performance evaluation indicators library of The top three hospitals clinicians; Get two rounds of Delphi expert advice of 21 expects; Use The SPSS 22.0 statistical software and direct approach to analysis consultation questionnaire of the two rounds of Delphi expert advice to determine weights of the indicators; Screening the set of Performance Evaluation Index System of Heilongjiang Province Hospital clinicians related to the actual situation of the hospital. Results The effective recovery rate of two rounds of the questionnaire were 100%, and the Expert positive coefficient was 1; The Expert authority of the coefficient mean was 0.79, and the Expert coordination coefficient was significant difference and P<0.001; Eventually established the Performance Evaluation Index System of public hospital in four level indicators, 7 secondary indicators,28 a three- level indicators, and the weight of 4 level indicators were 0.343,0.188,0.224,0.245. Conclusion The Experts enthusiasm, Expert authority of this study is high, and the Expert coordination coefficient is better; The assessment indicators has a high reliability and feasibility, and the set of Performance Evaluation Index System is fit to top three hospitals clinicians performance appraisal and evaluation. |
| Key words: |
