引用本文: 景日泽,章湖洋,方海.国际经验对我国建立长期照护保险制度的启示[J].中国卫生经济,2017,(7):89-93.[点击复制] .Implications of International Experience for Building Our Long-term Care Insurance System[J].CHINESE HEALTH ECONOMICS,2017,(7):89-93.[点击复制]
【打印本页】 查看/发表评论 关闭

←前一篇|后一篇→

过刊浏览    高级检索

本文已被:浏览 1592次   下载 54 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
国际经验对我国建立长期照护保险制度的启示
0
()
摘要:
目的:通过介绍几种国际上常用的长期照护保险制度,对我国建立适合我国国情的长期照护保险提供参考和借鉴。方法:主要通过搜索国外关于长期照护保险制度的文献资料,对其内容进行提取和总结,对我国的制度建设提供建议和借鉴。结果:文章总结国际上通用的长期照护保险制度有四种模式:私营长期照护社会保险,例如荷兰;公营长期照护社会保险,例如德国,日本;长期照护商业保险,例如美国;以及国家负责长期照护保险,例如英国。我国可以借鉴各种模式的优点,形成我们的制度。结论:荷兰、德国、日本以及美国的长期照护保险制度都有值得借鉴的地方,但是也有弊端,在扬长避短的基础上,形成我国合理的长期照护保险制度。
关键词:  
DOI:
基金项目:
Implications of International Experience for Building Our Long-term Care Insurance System
()
Abstract:
Objective: The present study introduced several international long-term care insurance systems. In order to provide references for building China’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’’s long-term care insurance system. Methods: Literature review. Results: The article concluded 4 kinds of systems for long-term care insurance including the private long-term care social insurance like Netherlands, the public long-term care social insurance like German and Japan, long-term care commercial insurance like America and national long-term care insurance like England. According to the different systems, we can form our own long-term insurance system. Conclusion: The long-term care insurance systems of Netherlands, German, Japan, American are good for our system construction, but they also has disadvantages, so on the basis of the foster strengths and circumvent weaknesses, we form our own reasonable long-term care insurance system.
Key words:  

用微信扫一扫

用微信扫一扫